Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Big Fish - "Which is worse: a lie that draws a smile, or a truth that draws a tear?"


In the film Corrina, Corrina (1994), a young girl tells her dad not to be jealous of the angels who are playing with her recently deceased mother. Her father, a stout atheist, tells his 5 year old daughter that heaven isn’t real; it’s just a place that people make up so that they aren’t sad anymore. She looks at him intently and then asks sincerely, “What’s wrong with that?” 

Corrina, Corrina (1994)

This idea is something that is central to the plot of Big Fish. The main struggle between Edward Bloom and his adult son is basically a debate of Sydney’s assertion that poets are not liars, since they never claim to tell the truth. The differences of opinions on this debate are presented clearly in the film through the characters of Edward, his son Will, and the supporting cast of Doctor Bennett, Sandra, and Josephine who all view Edwards’ stories with differing levels of seriousness and consequence.
The film opens with Edward Bloom telling Will the story of the day he caught the biggest fish in Alabama. A montage of scenes show the same story being told multiple times over the course of 30-some-odd years, with Will’s interest weaning and finally growing into resentment and aggression. Edward, however, retorts that “everyone loves that story!” to which Will points out that he doesn’t. Over and over again throughout the film, Will reminds Edward that he’s already heard all of these stories. Edward, however, is not discouraged by this. These stories are his life. At one point he tells Josephine a story about a dream he had as a kid in which a raven would tell him of his family members’ impending deaths. The story gets more intense and Josephine is intrigued until Edward delivers the punch line and a quick explanation, “you see, my mother was banging the milkman.” This shows that Edward does make a distinction between his life’s stories and fictitious stories or jokes. But to him, the real power behind the stories is not their historical facts, but their emotional and (at times) entertaining significance. At one point, Will accuses his father of never telling him a single fact. Edward responds with, “I've told you a thousand facts, Will, that's what I do. I tell stories.” To him, the actual events that occurred aren’t the facts, it’s the feelings and morals that they portray that are the truth.
Will, on the other hand, doesn’t see his father’s stories that way. To him they are lies, “entertaining lies.” He claims that he can’t know his father because he’s never heard a single fact. Will is far more interested in the historical actions that physically happened, the words that were literally said. Without the truth, Will cannot know his father the way he wants to know him. He is so desperate to get the facts straight that he drives out to Spectre to confront the woman who lives in a house that his father owns. After exchanging pleasantries with Jenny, he comes right out and asks if she was having an affair with his father. Edward was gone a lot and Will just assumes that he had another family somewhere that he would rather be with. Jenny doesn’t deny it. Instead she tells him the story of her relationship with Edward. She starts from the beginning and goes through all the details of buying the town, fixing her house, and finally his rejection of her advances. The part that Will cares about is the end: no, your father was not having an affair. But Jenny knows the importance of story and that the answer needed so much more than a simple “no” for it to begin to convey its real meaning. As Edward is in the hospital, dying, Dr. Bennett tells Will the true, factual, historical story of the day he was born. There was no fish, no lost wedding ring, no legend. Edward was simply out of town on sales when Will was born. Will says that he “kinda likes” the real version. At this point, Will gets the facts that he wanted and he begins to understand why his father chooses to tell more exaggerated versions.
The supporting characters seem to have a more balanced opinion on the merit of these “tall tales.” They use them as entertainment or and understand the underlying meaning they have. When Will first arrives at the house after not speaking to his father for three years he asks his mom how much time he has left. She responds, “We don’t talk about that.” Sandra knows that Edward doesn’t have much time, it’s a reality she has no way of escaping, but she chooses not to bring that particular fact to the forefront of conversations. Will would argue that this escapism is like lying about it and pretending it’s not happening. Edward might claim that the elephant in the room need never be brought up. Sandra finds the middle ground between these two extremes. She is dealing with the unpleasantness on her own. She’s not pretending that it’s not happening nor is she obsessing over it. Josephine enjoys the stories told by Edward, but acknowledges that they are “tall tales.” She even joins in on finishing one of his over-told stories. But she never condemns Ed nor Will for their opinions. She tells Will that she likes his father’s stories because they are “romantic.” The use of this word implies that she doesn’t care whether they’re true or not, because they help her believe in a powerful force for good – love. Dr. Bennett, the one who tells Will the real story of his birth, states the theme of the film with the most conviction:

“And that's the real story of how you were born. Not very exciting, is it? And I suppose if I had to choose between the true version and an elaborate one involving a fish and a wedding ring, I might choose the fancy version. But that's just me.” 

Knowing both versions, he is able to weigh the pros and cons of choosing which one to put stock in. He understands that Edward was disappointed that he wasn’t there for Will’s birth so he compensates with a story that attempts to meet the importance of the birth of his son.



              Through these characters, we see Sydney’s declaration being pulled and prodded, tried and tested. In the conclusion of the film, Will tells his dad a wild story that ends with Edward turning into a giant fish. Obviously not a true story, it still has elements of truth in it. All of the crazy characters from Edward’s lifetime of stories are there to send him off, and in the end Will tells him, “you become what you always were: a very big fish.” This prophetic statement is realized at Edward’s funeral when his friends are gathered around sharing their own stories of Edward, undoubtedly exaggerated. The film concludes in favor of stories. Will accepts that his father wasn’t always telling him facts, but he was telling him about himself through the expression of stories. It also affirms another of Sydney’s points: that poetry is dignified. Using these tall tales to teach his son about himself is using the best of both entertainment and history. This combination, as argued by the supporting characters and, I believe, the filmmakers themselves, is the perfect balance that Sydney assigns to poetry.

No comments:

Post a Comment